A comparative tale of two methods : how thematic and narrative analyses author the data story differently
dc.contributor.author | McAllum, Kirstie | |
dc.contributor.author | Fox, Stéphanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Simpson, Mary | |
dc.contributor.author | Unson, Christine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-26T18:50:04Z | |
dc.date.available | MONTHS_WITHHELD:18 | fr |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-26T18:50:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11-25 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/24965 | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | fr |
dc.subject | Interpretive research | fr |
dc.subject | Qualitative research | fr |
dc.subject | Thematic analysis | fr |
dc.subject | Narrative analysis | fr |
dc.subject | Researcher commitments | fr |
dc.title | A comparative tale of two methods : how thematic and narrative analyses author the data story differently | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de communication | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/22041451.2019.1677068 | |
dcterms.abstract | An interpretive qualitative approach insists on the plural and negotiated nature of the meanings that humans attach to their social realities. Thus, the qualitative researcher must navigate multiple and sometimes conflicting commitments to method, data, oneself, participants, and one’s reader. This can lead us to obscure the messiness of data analysis in final research reports and to downplay how methodological choices can make our participants ‘say things.’ In this article, we compare two interpretive methods, thematic and narrative analysis, including their shared epistemological and ontological premises, and offer a pedagogical demonstration of their application to the same data excerpt. However, our broader goal is to use the divergent results to critically examine how our choice of analytic method in interpretive research influences how we (researcher + method) ‘author’ data stories. Ultimately, researcher reflexivity must go beyond acknowledging how one’s position may influence the data analysis or the participant. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:2204-1451 | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:2206-3374 | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | McAllum, K., Fox, S., Simpson, M., & Unson, C. (2019). A comparative tale of two methods: How thematic and narrative analyses ‘author’ the data story differently. Communication Research & Practice, 5(4), 358-375. doi: 10.1080/22041451.2019.1677068 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Communication research and practice | fr |
oaire.citationVolume | 5 | fr |
oaire.citationIssue | 4 | fr |
oaire.citationStartPage | 358 | fr |
oaire.citationEndPage | 375 | fr |
Fichier·s constituant ce document
Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes
Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.