Théorie idéale et théorie non idéale : analyse du contractualisme subversif de Charles Mills
dc.contributor.advisor | Chung, Ryoa | |
dc.contributor.author | Desjarlais-Lessard, Jerome | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-10T15:20:26Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T15:20:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-03-25 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/23799 | |
dc.subject | Charles Mills | fr |
dc.subject | Racial justice | fr |
dc.subject | Ideal-theory | fr |
dc.subject | Non ideal-theory | fr |
dc.subject | Justice raciale | fr |
dc.subject | Théorie idéale | fr |
dc.subject | Théorie non-idéale | fr |
dc.subject | Rawls | fr |
dc.subject.other | Philosophy / Philosophie (UMI : 0422) | fr |
dc.title | Théorie idéale et théorie non idéale : analyse du contractualisme subversif de Charles Mills | fr |
dc.type | Thèse ou mémoire / Thesis or Dissertation | |
etd.degree.discipline | Philosophie | fr |
etd.degree.grantor | Université de Montréal | fr |
etd.degree.level | Maîtrise / Master's | fr |
etd.degree.name | M.A. | fr |
dcterms.abstract | Dans ce mémoire, nous nous pencherons sur le débat entre théorie idéale et théorie non idéale. Il s’agit d’un débat qui a déjà fait couler beaucoup d’encre et auquel s’ajoutent constamment de nouveaux auteurs. L’un des auteurs ayant retenu notre attention est Charles Mills. Nous pensons qu’il a apporté plusieurs contributions intéressantes aux débats méthodologiques entourant le rapport entre théorie idéale et théorie non idéale. Nous nous pencherons plus précisément sur les critiques de Mills en ce qui concerne la méthodologie élaborée par Rawls et sur leurs conséquences politiques. En mettant en relation les critiques de Mills, non seulement avec les idées de Rawls, mais aussi avec les débats contemporains, nous observerons comment ses critiques et ses propositions répondent à certaines problématiques observées lorsque nous tentons d’élaborer des politiques publiques à partir de la théorie idéale. | fr |
dcterms.abstract | In this thesis we will examine the debate between ideal theory and non-ideal theory. This is a debate that has already been much discussed, but new authors are constantly adding new arguments and new approaches. One of the authors who caught our attention is Charles Mills. We believe that he has made several interesting contributions to debates surrounding the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory and specifically on the methodological aspect. In this study, we will focus on Mills criticisms of the methodology developed by Rawls and the political consequences of these problems. By relating Mills criticism not only to Rawls ideas, but also to contemporary debates, we will observe how his criticisms and his propositions answer certain problems that we can observe when we try to think of concrete actions from the ideal theory. | fr |
dcterms.language | fra | fr |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.