Show item record

dc.contributor.authorBalayla, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorSheehy, Odile
dc.contributor.authorFraser, William
dc.contributor.authorSéguin, Jean
dc.contributor.authorTrasler, Jacquetta
dc.contributor.authorMonnier, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSimard, Marie-Noëlle
dc.contributor.authorMuckle, Gina
dc.contributor.authorBérard, Anick
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T18:21:23Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2018-09-19T18:21:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/20907
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.titleInfant neurodevelopmental outcomes following assisted reproductive technologiesfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. Département de psychiatrie et d'addictologiefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AOG.0000000000001837
dcterms.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare children's cognitive, motor, and language development at 2 years of age after assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) relative to natural conception. METHODS: The 3D-Study (2010–2012) is a prospective cohort study, which sought to improve the understanding among perinatal events, obstetric outcomes, and child development. A total of 2,366 pregnant women were recruited, of whom 278 conceived with ART: ovarian stimulation, intrauterine sperm insemination, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, or in vitro maturation. Natural conception was defined as the unassisted establishment of pregnancy. Cognitive, motor, and language neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared between ART and natural conception groups at 24 months using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, and the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. Adjusted linear regression models evaluated the effect of ART on neurodevelopmental outcomes using natural conception as a reference. RESULTS: A total of 175 children in the ART group (62.9%) and 1,345 children in the natural conception group (64.4%) underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at 24 months postpartum. After adjusting for relevant confounders, children born after ART showed no difference in Bayley scales' cognitive scores (B1 [standard error]=-1.60 [0.9], 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.36 to 0.16), composite motor scores (B1 [standard error]=-1.33 [1.0], 95% CI -3.29 to 0.63), or MacArthur-Bates language scores (B1 [standard error]=-0.28 [2.1], 95% CI -4.39 to 3.83). No difference was observed when independent ART techniques were compared nor when comparing in vivo (ovarian stimulation or intrauterine insemination) or in vitro (in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, or in vitro maturation) techniques (P>.05). CONCLUSION: Children born after ART had similar cognitive, motor, and language development as children born after natural conception at 2 years of age. These findings may be useful in the clinical counseling of patients undergoing ART.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0029-7844fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantBalayla, J., Sheehy, O., Fraser, W. D., Séguin, J. R., Trasler, J., Monnier, P., MacLeod, A. A., Simard, M.-N., Muckle, G. & Bérard, A. (2017) Infant neurodevelopmental outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129, 265-272.fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleObstetrics and gynecology
oaire.citationVolume129
oaire.citationIssue2
oaire.citationStartPage265
oaire.citationEndPage272


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.