Show item record

dc.contributor.authorFritel, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorDumoulin, Chantale
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-27T15:47:54Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2016-09-27T15:47:54Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/15835
dc.subjectUrinary incontinencefr
dc.titleIncontinence : stress urinary incontinence treatment—surgery first?fr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de réadaptationfr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/nrurol.2013.300
dcterms.abstractA randomized trial involving 460 women with stress urinary incontinence compared physiotherapy with midurethral-sling surgery. We question whether the results, showing higher rates of improvement and cure for surgery than for physiotherapy, should change best practice and clinical practice guideline recommendations.fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleNature reviews urology
oaire.citationVolume11
oaire.citationIssue1
oaire.citationStartPage10
oaire.citationEndPage11


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.