Show item record

dc.contributor.authorGaudette, Fleur
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Javier
dc.contributor.authorSteagall, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorBeaudry, Francis
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-15T14:25:56Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2015-10-15T14:25:56Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/12289
dc.subjectBupivacainefr
dc.subjectLiquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometryfr
dc.subjectBioanalysisfr
dc.subjectDrug metabolism and pharmacokineticsfr
dc.subjectOrbitrap Mass Spectrometerfr
dc.subjectHigh Resolutionfr
dc.subjectTriple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometerfr
dc.titleAssessment of Tandem Mass Spectrometry and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Bupivacaine in Plasmafr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine vétérinairefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bmc.3485
dcterms.abstractTriple quadrupole mass spectrometers coupled with high performance liquid chromatography are workhorses in quantitative bioanalyses. It provides substantial benefits including reproducibility, sensitivity and selectivity for trace analysis. Selected Reaction Monitoring allows targeted assay development but data sets generated contain very limited information. Data mining and analysis of non-targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry profiles of biological samples offer the opportunity to perform more exhaustive assessments, including quantitative and qualitative analysis. The objectives of this study was to test method precision and accuracy, statistically compare bupivacaine drug concentration in real study samples and verify if high resolution and accurate mass data collected in scan mode can actually permit retrospective data analysis, more specifically, extract metabolite related information. The precision and accuracy data presented using both instruments provided equivalent results. Overall, the accuracy was ranging from 106.2 to 113.2% and the precision observed was from 1.0 to 3.7%. Statistical comparisons using a linear regression between both methods reveal a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9996 and a slope of 1.02 demonstrating a very strong correlation between both methods. Individual sample comparison showed differences from -4.5% to 1.6% well within the accepted analytical error. Moreover, post acquisition extracted ion chromatograms at m/z 233.1648 ± 5 ppm (M-56) and m/z 305.2224 ± 5 ppm (M+16) revealed the presence of desbutyl-bupivacaine and three distinct hydroxylated bupivacaine metabolites. Post acquisition analysis allowed us to produce semiquantitative evaluations of the concentration-time profiles for bupicavaine metabolites.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0269-3879
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleBiomedical chromatography
oaire.citationVolume29
oaire.citationIssue11
oaire.citationStartPage1724
oaire.citationEndPage1730


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.