Show item record

dc.contributor.authorEhlers, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-20T18:40:33Z
dc.date.available2009-03-20T18:40:33Z
dc.date.issued2009-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/2740
dc.publisherUniversité de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques.fr
dc.subjectTwo-Sided Matchingen
dc.subjectStabilityen
dc.subjectManipulationen
dc.subjectCapacitiesen
dc.subjectC78en
dc.subjectD78en
dc.subjectI20en
dc.titleManipulation via Capacities Revisiteden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques
dcterms.abstractThis paper revisits manipulation via capacities in centralized two-sided matching markets. Sönmez (1997) showed that no stable mechanism is nonmanipulable via capacities. We show that non-manipulability via capacities can be equivalently described by two types of non-manipulation via capacities: non-Type-I-manipulability meaning that no college with vacant positions can manipulate by dropping some of its empty positions; and non-Type-II-manipulability meaning that no college with no vacant positions can manipulate by dropping some of its filled positions. Our main result shows that the student-optimal stable mechanism is the unique stable mechanism which is non-Type-I-manipulable via capacities and independent of truncations. Our characterization supports the use of the student-optimal stable mechanism in these matching markets because of its limited manipulability via capacities by colleges.en
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0709-9231
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Record
oaire.citationTitleCahier de recherche
oaire.citationIssue2009-03


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.