Abstract(s)
Using the population of all university professors (N=13,479) in the province of Quebec
(Canada), this paper analyses the concentration of funding, papers and citations at the level of
individual researchers. It shows that each of these distributions is different, citations being the
most concentrated followed by funding, papers published and, finally, number of funded
projects. Concentration measures also vary between disciplines; social sciences and humanities
generally being the most concentrated. The paper also shows that the correspondence between
the elites defined by each of these measures is limited. In fact, only 3.2% of the researchers are
in the top 10% for all indicators, while about 20% are in the top 10% for at least one of the
indicators. The paper concludes with a discussion of the causes of these observed differences
and formulates a few hypotheses.