Show item record

dc.contributor.authorPaul-Hus, Adèle
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Faes, Adrián A.
dc.contributor.authorSainte-Marie, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorDesrochers, Nadine
dc.contributor.authorCostas, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorLarivière, Vincent
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T15:53:58Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2020-03-31T15:53:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/23161
dc.publisherPublic library of sciencefr
dc.rightsCe document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleBeyond funding : acknowledgement patterns in biomedical, natural and social sciencesfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'informationfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0185578
dcterms.abstractFor the past 50 years, acknowledgments have been studied as important paratextual traces of research practices, collaboration, and infrastructure in science. Since 2008, funding acknowledgments have been indexed by Web of Science, supporting large-scale analyses of research funding. Applying advanced linguistic methods as well as Correspondence Analysis to more than one million acknowledgments from research articles and reviews published in 2015, this paper aims to go beyond funding disclosure and study the main types of contributions found in acknowledgments on a large scale and through disciplinary comparisons. Our analysis shows that technical support is more frequently acknowledged by scholars in Chemistry, Physics and Engineering. Earth and Space, Professional Fields, and Social Sciences are more likely to acknowledge contributions from colleagues, editors, and reviewers, while Biology acknowledgments put more emphasis on logistics and fieldworkrelated tasks. Conflicts of interest disclosures (or lack of thereof) are more frequently found in acknowledgments from Clinical Medicine, Health and, to a lesser extent, Psychology. These results demonstrate that acknowledgment practices truly do vary across disciplines and that this can lead to important further research beyond the sole interest in funding.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1932-6203fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant: Paul-Hus A, Dı´az-Faes AA, Sainte-Marie M, Desrochers N, Costas R, Larivière V (2017) Beyond funding: Acknowledgement patterns in biomedical, natural and social sciences. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0185578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0185578fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitlePLoS one
oaire.citationVolume12
oaire.citationIssue10


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RightsCe document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.