Show item record

dc.contributor.authorEhlers, Lars
dc.contributor.authorMasso, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T14:18:25Z
dc.date.available2018-05-16T14:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/19965
dc.publisherUniversité de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques.fr
dc.subjectMany-to-one matching marketfr
dc.subjectStabilityfr
dc.subjectIncomplete informationfr
dc.subjectMonotonic responsive extensionsfr
dc.subjectRobust mechanism designfr
dc.titleRobust design in monotonic matching markets : a case for firm-proposing deferred-acceptancefr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques
dcterms.abstractWe study two-sided matching markets among workers and firms. Workers seek one position at a firm but firms may employ several workers. In many applications those markets are monotonic: leaving positions unfilled is costly as for instance, for hospitals this means not being able to provide full service to its patients. A huge literature has advocated the use of stable mechanisms for clearinghouses. The interests among workers and firms are polarized among stable mechanisms, most famously the firm-proposing DA and the worker-proposing DA. We show that for the firm-proposing DA ex-ante incentive compatibility and ex-post incentive compatibility are equivalent whereas this is not necessarily true for the worker-proposing DA. The firm-proposing DA turns out to be more robust than the worker-proposing DA under incomplete information when incentives of both sides of the market are important.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0709-9231
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleCahier de recherche
oaire.citationIssue2018-02


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.