Show item record

dc.contributor.authorGaber, Amal
dc.contributor.authorGalarneau, Chantal
dc.contributor.authorFeine, Jocelyne S.
dc.contributor.authorEmami, Elham
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-02T15:52:46Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2017-11-02T15:52:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/19535
dc.titleRural-urban disparity in oral health-related quality of life
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine dentairefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cdoe.12344
dcterms.abstractOBJECTIVES: The objective of this population-based cross-sectional study was to estimate rural-urban disparity in the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of the Quebec adult population. METHODS: A 2-stage sampling design was used to collect data from the 1788 parents/caregivers of schoolchildren living in the 8 regions of the province of Quebec in Canada. Andersen's behavioural model for health services utilization was used as a conceptual framework. Place of residency was defined according to the Statistics Canada Census Metropolitan Area and Census Agglomeration Influenced Zone classification. The outcome of interest was OHRQoL measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 validated questionnaire. Data weighting was applied, and the prevalence, extent and severity of negative oral health impacts were calculated. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The prevalence of poor oral health-related quality life (OHRQoL) was statistically higher in rural areas than in urban zones (P = .02). Rural residents reported a significantly higher prevalence of negative daily-life impacts in pain, psychological discomfort and social disability OHIP domains (P < .05). Additionally, the rural population showed a greater number of negative oral health impacts (P = .03). There was no significant rural-urban difference in the severity of poor oral health. Logistic regression indicated that the prevalence of poor OHRQoL was significantly related to place of residency (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.1-2.5; P = .022), perceived oral health (OR = 9.4; 95% CI = 5.7-15.5; P < .001), dental treatment needs factors (perceived need for dental treatment, pain, dental care seeking) (OR = 8.7; 95% CI = 4.8-15.6; P < .001) and education (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.8-3.9; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest a potential difference in OHRQoL of Quebec rural and urban populations, and a need to develop strategies to promote oral health outcomes, specifically for rural residents. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1600-0528
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0301-5661
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology
oaire.citationVolume46
oaire.citationIssue2
oaire.citationStartPage132
oaire.citationEndPage142


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.