Show item record

dc.contributor.authorEngeli, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorRothmayr Allison, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T18:30:02Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T18:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.citationEngeli Isabelle & Christine Rothmyar. 2015. "When Doctors Shape Policy: The Impact of Self-Regulation on Governing Human Biotechnology". Regulation & Governance Vol.10 No.3: 246-261fr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/18537
dc.subjectAutorégulationfr
dc.subjectBiotechnologie humainefr
dc.subjectGouvernancefr
dc.subjectPolitiques publiques comparéesfr
dc.subjectProfession médicalefr
dc.titleWhen Doctors Shape Policy: The Impact of Self-Regulation on Governing Human Biotechnology
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de science politiquefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/rego.12078
dcterms.abstractThis paper investigates the development and adoption of governance modes in the field of human biotechnology. As the field of human biotechnology is relatively new, voluntary professional self-regulation constituted the initial governing mode. In the meantime, with the exception of Ireland, all Western European countries have moved towards greater state intervention. Nevertheless they have done so in contrasting ways and the resulting governance modes for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and embryonic stem-cell research vary greatly. Instead of imposing their steering capacity in a ‘top-down’ fashion, governments have taken pre-existing self-regulatory arrangements in the field into account and built up governance mechanisms in conjunction with private actors and pre-existing modes of private governance. Our analysis demonstrates that the form and content of the initial self-regulation explain why the self-steering capacity of the medical profession was largely or at least partially preserved through hybrid governance systems in Britain and in Germany, while in France the self-regulation was entirely replaced by governmental intervention.fr
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRegulation & Governance ; vol. 10, no 3
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record