Show item record

Early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairment

dc.contributor.authorJoubert, Sven
dc.contributor.authorGour, Natalina
dc.contributor.authorGuedj, Eric
dc.contributor.authorDidic, Mira
dc.contributor.authorGuériot, Claude
dc.contributor.authorKoric, Leila
dc.contributor.authorRanjeva, Jean-Philippe
dc.contributor.authorFelician, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorGuye, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorCeccaldi, Mathieu
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-11T16:31:06Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2016-01-11T16:31:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/12857
dc.subjectEarly-onset Alzheimer's diseasefr
dc.subjectLate-onset Alzheimer's diseasefr
dc.subjectCognitionfr
dc.subjectMemoryfr
dc.subjectSemantic memoryfr
dc.subjectNeuropsychological testsfr
dc.titleEarly-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairmentfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de psychologiefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.014
dcterms.abstractThe goal of this study was to investigate the specific patterns of memory breakdown in patients suffering from early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). Twenty EOAD patients, twenty LOAD patients, twenty matched younger controls, and twenty matched older controls participated in this study. All participants underwent a detailed neuropsychological assessment, an MRI scan, an FDG-PET scan, and AD patients had biomarkers as supporting evidence of both amyloïdopathy and neuronal injury. Results of the neuropsychological assessment showed that both EOAD and LOAD groups were impaired in the domains of memory, executive functions, language, praxis, and visuoconstructional abilities, when compared to their respective control groups. EOAD and LOAD groups, however, showed distinct patterns of memory impairment. Even though both groups were similarly affected on measures of episodic, short term and working memory, in contrast semantic memory was significantly more impaired in LOAD than in EOAD patients. The EOAD group was not more affected than the LOAD group in any memory domain. EOAD patients, however, showed significantly poorer performance in other cognitive domains including executive functions and visuoconstructional abilities. A more detailed analysis of the pattern of semantic memory performance among patient groups revealed that the LOAD was more profoundly impaired, in tasks of both spontaneous recall and semantic recognition. Voxel-Based Morphometry (VBM) analyses showed that impaired semantic performance in patients was associated with reduced gray matter volume in the anterior temporal lobe region, while PET-FDG analyses revealed that poorer semantic performance was associated with greater hypometabolism in the left temporoparietal region, both areas reflecting key regions of the semantic network. Results of this study indicate that EOAD and LOAD patients present with distinct patterns of memory impairment, and that a genuine semantic impairment may represent one of the clinical hallmarks of LOAD.fr
dcterms.alternativeMemory impairment in EOAD and LOADfr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1973-8102
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0010-9452
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleCortex
oaire.citationVolume74
oaire.citationStartPage217
oaire.citationEndPage232


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.