Show item record

dc.contributor.authorHolm, Søren
dc.contributor.authorWilliams-Jones, Bryn
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-05T21:56:40Z
dc.date.available2007-01-05T21:56:40Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/654
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/7/10
dc.format.extent1292317 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.rightsCeci est un article en accès libre diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons Paternité laquelle permet une libre utilisation, diffusion et reproduction de l'article sous toutes formes, à la condition de l'attribuer à l'auteur en citant son nom. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
dc.titleGlobal bioethics – myth or reality?
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. École de santé publique. Département de médecine sociale et préventivefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6939-7-10
dcterms.abstractBACKGROUND:There has been debate on whether a global or unified field of bioethics exists. If bioethics is a unified global field, or at the very least a closely shared way of thinking, then we should expect bioethicists to behave the same way in their academic activities anywhere in the world. This paper investigates whether there is a 'global bioethics' in the sense of a unified academic community.METHODS:To address this question, we study the web-linking patterns of bioethics institutions, the citation patterns of bioethics papers and the buying patterns of bioethics books.RESULTS:All three analyses indicate that there are geographical and institutional differences in the academic behavior of bioethicists and bioethics institutions.CONCLUSION:These exploratory studies support the position that there is no unified global field of bioethics. This is a problem if the only reason is parochialism. But these regional differences are probably of less concern if one notices that bioethics comes in many not always mutually understandable dialects.en
dcterms.descriptionAffiliation: Bryn Williams-Jones : Département de médicine sociale et préventive, Faculté de medecine, Université de Montréal
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1472-6939
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleBMC medical ethics
oaire.citationVolume7


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

Ceci est un article en accès libre diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons Paternité laquelle permet une libre utilisation, diffusion et reproduction de l'article sous toutes formes, à la condition de l'attribuer à l'auteur en citant son nom. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Usage rights : Ceci est un article en accès libre diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons Paternité laquelle permet une libre utilisation, diffusion et reproduction de l'article sous toutes formes, à la condition de l'attribuer à l'auteur en citant son nom. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.