Show item record

dc.contributor.authorBlackorby, Charles
dc.contributor.authorBossert, Walter
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, David
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-22T19:55:14Z
dc.date.available2006-09-22T19:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/370
dc.format.extent211234 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherUniversité de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques.fr
dc.subjectwelfarisme
dc.subjectchoix social multiprofil
dc.subjectwelfarism
dc.subjectmultiple-profile social choice
dc.titleIn Defense of Welfarism
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques
dcterms.abstractThis paper characterizes welfarist social evaluation in a multi-profile setting where, in addition to multiple utility profiles, it is assumed that there are several profiles of non-welfare information. We prove new versions of the welfarism theorems in this alternative framework, and we illustrate that a very plausible and weak anonymity property is sufficient to generate anonymous social-evaluation orderings.
dcterms.abstractCet article caractérise l’évaluation sociale welfaristique dans un cadre multiprofil dans lequel, outre les multiples profils d’utilité, on suppose qu’il y a plusieurs profils d’information non welfaristique. Nous prouvons de nouvelles versions des théorèmes de welfarisme dans ce cadre alternatif et nous montrons qu’une propriété très plausible et faible d’anonymat est suffisante pour générer des ordres d’évaluation sociale anonyme.
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0709-9231
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Record
oaire.citationTitleCahier de recherche
oaire.citationIssue2002-02


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.