In Defense of Welfarism
dc.contributor.author | Blackorby, Charles | |
dc.contributor.author | Bossert, Walter | |
dc.contributor.author | Donaldson, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-22T19:55:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-22T19:55:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/370 | |
dc.format.extent | 211234 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Université de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques. | fr |
dc.subject | welfarisme | |
dc.subject | choix social multiprofil | |
dc.subject | welfarism | |
dc.subject | multiple-profile social choice | |
dc.title | In Defense of Welfarism | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques | |
dcterms.abstract | This paper characterizes welfarist social evaluation in a multi-profile setting where, in addition to multiple utility profiles, it is assumed that there are several profiles of non-welfare information. We prove new versions of the welfarism theorems in this alternative framework, and we illustrate that a very plausible and weak anonymity property is sufficient to generate anonymous social-evaluation orderings. | |
dcterms.abstract | Cet article caractérise l’évaluation sociale welfaristique dans un cadre multiprofil dans lequel, outre les multiples profils d’utilité, on suppose qu’il y a plusieurs profils d’information non welfaristique. Nous prouvons de nouvelles versions des théorèmes de welfarisme dans ce cadre alternatif et nous montrons qu’une propriété très plausible et faible d’anonymat est suffisante pour générer des ordres d’évaluation sociale anonyme. | |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0709-9231 | |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | |
oaire.citationTitle | Cahier de recherche | |
oaire.citationIssue | 2002-02 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.