The Economics Of Civil Law Contract And Of Good Faith
Conference object
Is part of
Symposium in honour of Michael J. Trebilcock ; Toronto (Ont.), 2009-10-01 - 2009-10-02.Affiliation
Abstract(s)
In his 1993 book on the Limits of Freedom of Contract, Michael Trebilcock acknowledged the difficulties of trying to set criteria for correcting informational asymmetries. Informational asymmetries are one opening for opportunism and it has been generally acknowledged that one of the fundamental objectives of legal systems is to curtail opportunism. A civil-code based legal system has the ambition of being closed, i.e. covering all difficulties in private relationships within its purview. To accomplish this, it has to rely on open-ended concepts that can be used in unforeseen circumstances; yet legal certainty requires that such concepts be used sparingly and that recurrent circumstances calling for their application be particularised into more specific concepts having their own more detailed legal regime. The paper seeks to make the case that good faith in civil law systems is the exact opposite of opportunism; that it is one of the residual open-ended concepts 'closing' the system; and that it is particularised in a number of civil code concepts. These developments allow us to illustrate the difficulties Michael foretold in his book.
Table of contents
Summary.................................... 1
Introduction............................... 2
Preliminary thoughts: On civil law systems. 3
I. The general function of contract law . 4
II. Opportunism and good faith............ 10
A. Opportunism......................... 10
B. Good faith.......................... 13
Conclusion................................. 15
Bibliography............................... 16
Note(s)
Version originale de l'auteur·e / Author's OriginalCollections
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.