Abstract(s)
This paper inquires about the defensibility of spiritual faith in this Nominalistic age, i.e.,
an age when all reality is reduced to scientifically ascertainable matter and all spiritual realities
are deemed to be irreal. This Nominalistic worldview was developed in the late Middle Ages and
became one of the major presuppositions of Modernity. It has made it ever more difficult to defend
the legitimacy of faith and its objects. It also played an important, albeit seldom recognized, role in
the emergence of Hermeneutical thought in the 20th Century. In his strong, if also seldom carefully
studied, interpretation of Heidegger’s philosophy, Gadamer saw in the Nominalism of Modernity
one of the main challenges to which Heidegger’s thinking wished to respond: the hegemony of the
Nominalistic understanding of being would have led to the Nihilism of our technological Age and
made the experience of the Divine unthinkable. After recalling the outlines of this interpretation and
of the meaning of Nominalism itself, this paper argues that this Nominalism was also one of the main
challenges Gadamer wanted to overcome with his Hermeneutics. It discusses how Hermeneutics
strives to overcome this Nominalism by calling into question the monopoly of scientific truth (an effort
summed up in the title “Truth and Method”) and through its renewed understanding of language
as the presentation of Being itself, which goes hand in hand with the rediscovery of the Platonic
metaphysics of the Beautiful. Hermeneutics thus shows how something like faith is defensible and
thus makes an important theological and metaphysical contribution.