Afficher la notice

dc.contributor.authorOsa García, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorBrambati, Simona Maria
dc.contributor.authorDesautels, Alex
dc.contributor.authorMarcotte, Karine
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-09T12:20:00Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2022-08-09T12:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/26744
dc.publisherElsevierfr
dc.subjectDiffusion imagingfr
dc.subjectDTIfr
dc.subjectWhite matterfr
dc.subjectStrokefr
dc.subjectCytotoxic edemafr
dc.subjectVasogenic edemafr
dc.titleTiming stroke : a review on stroke pathophysiology and its influence over time on diffusion measuresfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École d'orthophonie et d'audiologiefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jns.2022.120377
dcterms.abstractDiffusion imaging (DWI) is considered an optimal technique to detect hyperacute cerebral ischemia and has thus enriched the clinical management of patients with suspected stroke. Researchers have taken this technique beyond with Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-extracted measures, which have been proposed as biomarkers of stroke progression. A large body of literature report on the correlates between pathophysiological events, such as cytotoxic and vasogenic edema, and diffusion changes in the brain. However, a unified picture of these changes, and their exploration as stroke pathology progression biomarkers, remains to be done. We present here a narrative review on the different pathophysiological events underlying stroke from onset until late subacute stages and its relation to different brain edema forms. Studies included in this review used either DWI and/or DTI analysis in hyperacute (<24 h), acute (1–7 days), early subacute (7–30 days) and/or late subacute (1–6 months) phase of stroke, including human and animal models. Our conclusions are that diffusion measures should be considered as a potential proxy measure for stroke neuroinflammation status, specially in early stages of the disease. Furthermore, we suggest that the choice of diffusion measures and the interpretation of their changes, in both research and clinical settings, need to be linked to the different stroke phases to account correctly for the progression, and eventual resolution, of neuroinflammation.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0022-510Xfr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposanthttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120377fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleJournal of the neurological sciencesfr


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Microsoft Word

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.