Articuler histoire du regard et travail en archives : le cas de En sursis
dc.contributor.author | Besson, Rémy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-06T13:43:32Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-06T13:43:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/25826 | |
dc.publisher | Éditions Kimé | fr |
dc.title | Articuler histoire du regard et travail en archives : le cas de En sursis | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département d'histoire de l'art et d'études cinématographiques | fr |
dcterms.abstract | This paper deals with the editing process of Harun Farocki’s Respite [Aufschub] and it's interpretation by visual historians. The approach tries to create links between film history, based on close readings of archives, and cultural studies, based on readings of film interpretation. Firstly, it is the result of a systematic comparison between the footage shot by an inmate in the Transit camp of Westerbork (Holland) during the Holocaust, and the film edited between 2007 and 2008. Secondly, this comparison is linked to papers about Respite, published between 2008 and 2016 (Didi-Huberman, Elsaesser, Kékesi, Kramer, Lindeperg, Rascaroli). This experimental film – the case study of this essay – leads to a better understanding of Holocaust representation and of some patterns of our current visual culture.. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:2497-6318 | fr |
dcterms.language | fra | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | Rémy Besson, « Articuler histoire du regard et travail en archives : Le cas de En Sursis (Harun Farocki).», Mémoire en jeu, n°3, 2017, p. 102-107. | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Mémoires en jeu : enjeux de société | fr |
oaire.citationIssue | 3 | fr |
oaire.citationStartPage | 102 | fr |
oaire.citationEndPage | 107 | fr |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.