Afficher la notice

dc.contributor.authorBordet, Sylvie
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, Sabrina
dc.contributor.authorKnoppers, Bartha Maria
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-25T14:30:09Z
dc.date.available2008-09-25T14:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/2581
dc.format.extent161465 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherMcGill Health Law Publicationen
dc.titleLegal aspects of animal-human combinations in Canadaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de droit. Centre de recherche en droit publicfr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de droitfr
dcterms.abstractThis article examines the current legal regime applicable to animal-human combinations under the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (Canada). The Act prohibits as criminal offences the use of non-human reproductive material in humans, the use in humans of human reproductive material previously transplanted into a non-human life form, the creation of chimeras made from human embryos, and the creation for reproductive purposes of human/non-human hybrids. Additional animal-human combinations, such as transgenic life forms, may be regulated pursuant to section 11 of the Act in the future. The underlying concerns of the Act in establishing this regime appear to be the protection of human health and safety, human dignity and individuality, and the human genome. The Act seems calibrated to prohibit the creation of animal-human combinations that are currently unsafe and scientifically and ethically problematic, while leaving open the possibility of regulating other such combinations with more immediate scientific potential, although these also raise ethical questions. Currently, certain differences subsist in Canada between what is permissible for researchers and institutions funded by federal agencies and those in privately funded research. The development of the regulatory framework under the Act will reveal how freedom of research will be balanced against the need for scientifically valid and ethically justifiable research, and whether these differences will continue to apply.en
dcterms.description[À l'origine dans / Was originally part of : CRDP - Droit, biotechnologie et rapport au milieu]fr
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleMcGill health law publication
oaire.citationStartPage83
oaire.citationEndPage99


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Vignette

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.