dc.contributor.author | Ni, Chaoqun | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Elise | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuan, Haimiao | |
dc.contributor.author | Larivière, Vincent | |
dc.contributor.author | Sugimoto, Cassidy R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-02T18:05:47Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-02T18:05:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/25782 | |
dc.publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science | fr |
dc.rights | Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License. | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.title | The gendered nature of authorship | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1126/sciadv.abe4639 | |
dcterms.abstract | Authorship is the primary form of symbolic capital in science. Despite this, authorship is rife with injustice and
malpractice, with women expressing concerns regarding the fair attribution of credit. Based on an international
survey, we examine gendered practices in authorship communication, disagreement, and fairness. Our results
demonstrate that women were more likely to experience authorship disagreements and experience them more
often. Their contributions to research papers were more often devalued by both men and women. Women were
more likely to discuss authorship with coauthors at the beginning of the project, whereas men were more likely
to determine authorship unilaterally at the end. Women perceived that they received less credit than deserved,
while men reported the opposite. This devaluation of women’s work in science creates cumulative disadvantages
in scientific careers. Open discussion regarding power dynamics related to gender is necessary to develop more
equitable distribution of credit for scientific labor. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:2375-2548 | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4639 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Science advances | fr |
oaire.citationVolume | 7 | fr |