Afficher la notice

dc.contributor.authorSwaine, Bonnie
dc.contributor.authorPoncet, Frédérique
dc.contributor.authorLachance, Brigitte
dc.contributor.authorProulx-Goulet, Chloé
dc.contributor.authorBergeron, Vicky
dc.contributor.authorBrousse, Élodie
dc.contributor.authorLamoureux, Julie
dc.contributor.authorMckinley, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-22T12:11:25Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2021-09-22T12:11:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/25738
dc.publisherFrontiers mediafr
dc.subjectDance therapyfr
dc.subjectPhysical disabilityfr
dc.subjectEffectivenessfr
dc.subjectRehabilitationfr
dc.subjectAdultsfr
dc.titleThe effectiveness of dance therapy as an adjunct to rehabilitation of adults with a physical disabilityfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de réadaptationfr
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01963
dcterms.abstractBackground/Objective: To determine the added benefit on participants’ mobility and participation of a 12-week dance therapy (DT) intervention combined with usual physical rehabilitation for adults with varied physical disabilities. Their appreciation of DT was also explored. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study pre–post test with a nonequivalent control group and repeated measurements pre, post, and at a 3-month follow-up. Results: Although participants in both groups significantly improved over time (at 12 weeks and at follow-up) compared to baseline on mobility (timed up and go, TUG) and participation (e.g., Life-H scores and number of leisure activities), treatment effect analysis using propensity score matching showed no significant treatment effect of DT. The TUG scores showed the best promise of a treatment effect. DT participants’ Flow State Scale scores significantly improved (p < 0.01) for 5/9 dimensions of flow (being in control, loss of self-consciousness), and they all recommended DT. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate an added benefit of the DT intervention in improving participants’ mobility and participation. Overwhelmingly, favorable participants’ opinions about the intervention support its potential impact.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1664-1078fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01963fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleFrontiers in psychologyfr
oaire.citationVolume11fr


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Vignette

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.