Glass versus crystal : a balancing act between competing intermolecular interactions
dc.contributor.author | Laventure, Audrey | |
dc.contributor.author | Maris, Thierry | |
dc.contributor.author | Pellerin, Christian | |
dc.contributor.author | Lebel, Olivier | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-06T18:36:11Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-06T18:36:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04-14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/25334 | |
dc.publisher | American Chemical Society | fr |
dc.subject | Crystallization | fr |
dc.subject | Crystal structure | fr |
dc.subject | Molecules | fr |
dc.subject | Amorphous materials | fr |
dc.subject | Molecular interactions | fr |
dc.title | Glass versus crystal : a balancing act between competing intermolecular interactions | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de chimie | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b01567 | |
dcterms.abstract | Hydrogen (H) bonds can be used either for crystal engineering or for designing compounds capable of forming very stable glassy phases. Herein, a second type of directional noncovalent interaction, π–π stacking, is introduced to establish the interplay between both types of interactions on crystal and glass formation. For this purpose, two mexylaminotriazine derivatives incorporating 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostilbene groups (with or without a H-bond donor at the 2 position of the triazine) and their nonfluorinated analogues were synthesized to compare their glass-forming and crystallization properties. Although all four compounds showed glass-forming ability, only the fluorinated compounds showed crystallization with kinetics strongly affected by the presence or absence of the H-bond donor group. X-ray diffraction of the pentafluorostilbene-containing derivatives revealed an extended π–π stacking interaction different from that of 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostilbene. These results, combined with infrared spectroscopy measurements, suggest that π–π stacking promotes crystallization whereas hydrogen bonding impedes it due to the higher conformational constraints imposed by π–π stacking, thereby decreasing the degrees of liberty and the possibilities for secondary interactions with other molecules. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1528-7483 | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1528-7505 | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b01567 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Crystal growth and design | fr |
oaire.citationVolume | 17 | fr |
oaire.citationIssue | 5 | fr |
oaire.citationStartPage | 2365 | fr |
oaire.citationEndPage | 2373 | fr |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.