Show item record

dc.contributor.authorBrisebois, Amélie
dc.contributor.authorBrambati, Simona Maria
dc.contributor.authorBoucher, Johémie
dc.contributor.authorRochon, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Carol
dc.contributor.authorDésilets-Barnabé, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorDesautels, Alex
dc.contributor.authorMarcotte, Karine
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-06T12:25:32Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2021-04-06T12:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/24949
dc.publisherRoutledgefr
dc.subjectAphasiafr
dc.subjectDiscoursefr
dc.subjectLanguage recoveryfr
dc.subjectAcute strokefr
dc.subjectInformativenessfr
dc.titleA longitudinal study of narrative discourse in post-stroke aphasiafr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École d'orthophonie et d'audiologiefr
dcterms.abstractBackground: Previous findings have demonstrated the importance of discourse analysis in post-stroke aphasia, as it allows for in-depth examination of language impairment and represents key components of functional communication. However, little is known about the recovery of discourse over time. Aims: The main aim of this study is to measure the longitudinal changes in descriptive discourse production from the acute to chronic stages of post-stroke aphasia recovery. The secondary aim is to explore the association between discourse measures and overall language impairment severity measures at different testing points. Methods & Procedure: Seventeen French Canadian speakers with various types and severities of aphasia following a first left middle cerebral artery stroke participated in this study. They underwent three language assessments (acute: 0 to 72 hours; subacute: 7 to 14 days; chronic: 6 to 12 months post-onset). The picture description from the Western Aphasia Battery was analyzed at three time points. Changes in terms of thematic informativeness and microstructural variables were analyzed. Outcomes & Results: Regarding the micro-structural variables, the mean length of utterances (MLU) and the number of words per minute showed significant positive changes between the acute and chronic phases. For the thematic informativeness measures, the number of thematic units (TUs), the number of thematic units per minute (TUs/min) and the number of thematic units per utterance (TUs/utt) 4 increased significantly between the acute and chronic phases. Positive correlations between TUs and MLU in the acute phase and a general language impairment severity measure in the acute and chronic phases suggest a relationship between these measures and global language performance suggesting the potential predictive value of these variables in the acute phase. Conclusions & Implications: These findings support the use of thematic units in descriptive discourse analysis during an acute clinical examination of language as they require minimal additional time to score and track changes in post-stroke aphasia recovery. They capture long-term changes in discourse abilities and appear related to overall language measures in both the acute and chronic stages of recovery. The interpretation of the changes in MLU and the number of words per minute is less straightforward, as improvements in these measures carry different interpretations depending on the type of aphasia. Nonetheless, further studies are required to investigate test-retest reliability and the effect of therapy on the changes observed over time when using thematic units to document change in discourse.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0268-7038fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1464-5041fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposanthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1907295fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion originale de l'auteur·e / Author's Originalfr
oaire.citationTitleAphasiologyfr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.