dc.contributor.author | Fontaine, Guillaume | |
dc.contributor.author | Lavallée, Andréane | |
dc.contributor.author | Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André | |
dc.contributor.author | Bouix-Picasso, Julien | |
dc.contributor.author | Bourbonnais, Anne | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-24T17:57:04Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-24T17:57:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/24935 | |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | fr |
dc.rights | Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License. | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.fr | |
dc.title | Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem : a systematic scoping review protocol | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des sciences infirmières | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833 | |
dcterms.abstract | Introduction The optimisation of health science
communication (HSC) between researchers and the public
is crucial. In the last decade, the rise of the digital and
social media ecosystem allowed for the disintermediation
of HSC. Disintermediation refers to the public’s direct
access to information from researchers about health
science-related topics through the digital and social
media ecosystem, a process that would otherwise require
a human mediator, such as a journalist. Therefore, the
primary aim of this scoping review is to describe the
nature and the extent of the literature regarding HSC
strategies involving disintermediation used by researchers
with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem.
The secondary aim is to describe the HSC strategies
used by researchers, and the communication channels
associated with these strategies.
Methods and analysis We will conduct a scoping review
based on the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology
and perform a systematic search of six bibliographical
databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, IBSS, PubMed, Sociological
Abstracts and Web of Science), four trial registries and
relevant sources of grey literature. Relevant journals and
reference lists of included records will be hand-searched.
Data will be managed using the EndNote software and
the Rayyan web application. Two review team members
will perform independently the screening process as
well as the full-text assessment of included records.
Descriptive data will be synthesised in a tabular format.
Data regarding the nature and the extent of the literature,
the HSC strategies and the associated communication
channels will be presented narratively.
Ethics and dissemination This review does not require
institutional review board approval as we will use only
collected and published data. Results will allow the
mapping of the literature about HSC between researchers
and the public in the digital and social media ecosystem,
and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:2044-6055 | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | BMJ Open | fr |
oaire.citationVolume | 8 | fr |