Show item record

dc.contributor.authorFontaine, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorLavallée, Andréane
dc.contributor.authorMaheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
dc.contributor.authorBouix-Picasso, Julien
dc.contributor.authorBourbonnais, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T17:57:04Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2021-03-24T17:57:04Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/24935
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupfr
dc.rightsCe document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.fr
dc.titleHealth science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem : a systematic scoping review protocolfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des sciences infirmièresfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833
dcterms.abstractIntroduction The optimisation of health science communication (HSC) between researchers and the public is crucial. In the last decade, the rise of the digital and social media ecosystem allowed for the disintermediation of HSC. Disintermediation refers to the public’s direct access to information from researchers about health science-related topics through the digital and social media ecosystem, a process that would otherwise require a human mediator, such as a journalist. Therefore, the primary aim of this scoping review is to describe the nature and the extent of the literature regarding HSC strategies involving disintermediation used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem. The secondary aim is to describe the HSC strategies used by researchers, and the communication channels associated with these strategies. Methods and analysis We will conduct a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology and perform a systematic search of six bibliographical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, IBSS, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts and Web of Science), four trial registries and relevant sources of grey literature. Relevant journals and reference lists of included records will be hand-searched. Data will be managed using the EndNote software and the Rayyan web application. Two review team members will perform independently the screening process as well as the full-text assessment of included records. Descriptive data will be synthesised in a tabular format. Data regarding the nature and the extent of the literature, the HSC strategies and the associated communication channels will be presented narratively. Ethics and dissemination This review does not require institutional review board approval as we will use only collected and published data. Results will allow the mapping of the literature about HSC between researchers and the public in the digital and social media ecosystem, and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:2044-6055fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposanthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleBMJ Openfr
oaire.citationVolume8fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usage rights : Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.