Abstract(s)
BACKGROUND: The optimal antiplatelet strategy for patients with acute coronary syndromes who require coronary artery
bypass surgery remains unclear. While a more potent antiplatelet regimen will predispose to perioperative bleeding, it is
hypothesized that through “platelet quiescence,” ischemic protection conferred by such therapy may provide a net clinical
benefit.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery who were treated with a more potent antiplatelet inhibition strategy with those with a less potent inhibition through a meta-analysis. The primary outcome was
all-cause mortality after bypass surgery. The analysis identified 4 studies in which the antiplatelet regimen was randomized
and 6 studies that were nonrandomized. Combining all studies, there was an overall higher mortality with weaker strategies
compared with more potent strategies (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03–1.85; P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the concept of platelet quiescence, in reducing mortality for patients with acute coronary
syndrome requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. This suggests the routine up-front use of potent antiplatelet regimens in
acute coronary syndrome, irrespective of likelihood of coronary artery bypass graft.