Show item record

dc.contributor.authorRivard, Lysanne
dc.contributor.authorLehoux, Pascale
dc.contributor.authorHagemeister, Nicola
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T18:35:51Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:24fr
dc.date.available2021-02-12T18:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/24857
dc.publisherElsevierfr
dc.subjectDesign practicefr
dc.subjectEthicsfr
dc.subjectInnovationfr
dc.subjectCarefr
dc.titleArticulating care and responsibility in design : a study on the reasoning processes guiding health innovators’ ‘care-making’ practicesfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. École de santé publiquefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.destud.2020.100986
dcterms.abstractThis article explores how health innovation designers articulate care and responsibility when designing new health technologies. Towards this end, we draw on Tronto’s ethic of care framework and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) scholarship to analyse interviews with Canadian health innovators (n=31). Our findings clarify how respondents: 1) direct their attention to needs and ways to improve care; 2) mobilise their skill set to take care of problems; 3) engage in what we call ‘care-making’ practices by prioritising key material qualities; and 4) operationalise responsiveness to caregivers and care-receivers through user-centred design. We discuss the inclusion of health innovation designers within the care relationship as ‘care-makers’ as well as the tensions underlying their ways of caring and their conflicting responsibilities.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0142-694Xfr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposanthttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100986fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleDesign studiesfr
oaire.citationVolume72fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.