Comparison of parametric methods for modeling corneal surfaces
dc.contributor.author | Bouazizi, Hala | |
dc.contributor.author | Brunette, Isabelle | |
dc.contributor.author | Meunier, Jean | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-02T12:43:49Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-02T12:43:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-02-24 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/23172 | |
dc.publisher | Society of photo-optical instrumentation engineers | fr |
dc.subject | Zernike polynomials | fr |
dc.subject | Bhatia-Wolf polynomials | fr |
dc.subject | Spherical harmonics | fr |
dc.subject | 3D shape | fr |
dc.subject | Parametric model | fr |
dc.subject | Corneal topography | fr |
dc.title | Comparison of parametric methods for modeling corneal surfaces | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. Département d'ophtalmologie | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1117/12.2254426 | |
dcterms.abstract | Corneal topography is a medical imaging technique to get the 3D shape of the cornea as a set of 3D points of its anterior and posterior surfaces. From these data, topographic maps can be derived to assist the ophthalmologist in the diagnosis of disorders. In this paper, we compare three different mathematical parametric representations of the corneal surfaces leastsquares fitted to the data provided by corneal topography. The parameters obtained from these models reduce the dimensionality of the data from several thousand 3D points to only a few parameters and could eventually be useful for diagnosis, biometry, implant design etc. The first representation is based on Zernike polynomials that are commonly used in optics. A variant of these polynomials, named Bhatia-Wolf will also be investigated. These two sets of polynomials are defined over a circular domain which is convenient to model the elevation (height) of the corneal surface. The third representation uses Spherical Harmonics that are particularly well suited for nearly-spherical object modeling, which is the case for cornea. We compared the three methods using the following three criteria: the root-mean-square error (RMSE), the number of parameters and the visual accuracy of the reconstructed topographic maps. A large dataset of more than 2000 corneal topographies was used. Our results showed that Spherical Harmonics were superior with a RMSE mean lower than 2.5 microns with 36 coefficients (order 5) for normal corneas and lower than 5 microns for two diseases affecting the corneal shapes: keratoconus and Fuchs’ dystrophy. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0277-786X | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1996-756X | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | Bouazizi H, Brunette I, Meunier J. Comparison of parametric methods for modeling corneal surfaces. SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing. 2017 Feb 24; 101332E, doi: 10.1117/12.2254426 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Proceedings of SPIE |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.