Individualisme, subjectivisme et mécanismes économiques
dc.contributor.author | Lagueux, Maurice | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-28T19:21:15Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-28T19:21:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/22078 | |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | fr |
dc.title | Individualisme, subjectivisme et mécanismes économiques | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de philosophie | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0012217300004947 | |
dcterms.abstract | The economists of the Austrian School count among the most consistent supporters of methodological individualism, but they were for the most part strongly opposed to clearly anti-holist trends such as constructivism, reductionism, and positivism. This article discusses why the sort of methodological individualism defended by the Austrians could not, for interconnected reasons, be rendered compatible with any one of these philosophical trends. The manner in which the Austrians managed to reconcile their analysis of economic mechanisms with a strictly subjectivist approach is especially considered. The discussion also underscores some ambiguous dimensions of the debate between holism and individualism. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0012-2173 | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1759-0949 | fr |
dcterms.language | fra | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | «Individualisme, subjectivisme et mécanismes économiques», Dialogue, 40, 4 (2001), 691-722. | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Dialogue : Canadian Philosophy Review = Dialogue : Revue canadienne de philosophie | |
oaire.citationVolume | 40 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 4 | |
oaire.citationStartPage | 691 | |
oaire.citationEndPage | 722 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.