Random consideration and choice: A case study of «default» options
dc.contributor.author | Horan, Sean | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-05T19:09:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-05T19:09:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/21099 | |
dc.publisher | Université de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques. | fr |
dc.title | Random consideration and choice: A case study of «default» options | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques | |
dcterms.abstract | A growing number of stochastic choice models include a “default” option for situations where the decision maker selects none of the feasible alternatives. While this is a welcome development, these models also present an empirical challenge - since the situations where the decision-maker chooses nothing may be difficult to observe. Taking Manzini and Mariotti’s (2014) independent random consideration model as a point of departure, I investigate what can be learned about models of choice with default when the no-choice behavior of the decision-maker is unobservable. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0709-9231 | |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Cahier de recherche | |
oaire.citationIssue | 2018-11 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.