Afficher la notice

dc.contributor.authorSteinhauer, Karsten
dc.contributor.authorRoyle, Phaedra
dc.contributor.authorDrury, John E.
dc.contributor.authorFromont, Lauren A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-17T14:03:29Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2018-04-17T14:03:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/19932
dc.publisherElsevierfr
dc.subjectN400fr
dc.subjectSemantic primingfr
dc.subjectContext effectsfr
dc.subjectList effectsfr
dc.subjectRelational primingfr
dc.subjectAnalogical reasoningfr
dc.titleThe priming of priming : Evidence that the N400 reflects context-dependent post-retrieval word integration in working memoryfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École d'orthophonie et d'audiologiefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.007
dcterms.abstractWhich cognitive processes are reflected by the N400 in ERPs is still controversial. Various recent articles(Lau et al., 2008; Brouwer et al., 2012) have revived the idea that only lexical pre-activation processes(such as automatic spreading activation, ASA) are strongly supported, while post-lexical integrative pro-cesses are not. Challenging this view, the present ERP study replicates a behavioral study by McKoon andRatcliff (1995) who demonstrated that a prime-target pair such as finger − hand shows stronger primingwhen a majority of other pairs in the list share the analogous semantic relationship (here: part-whole),even at short stimulus onset asynchronies (250 ms). We created lists with four different types of semanticrelationship (synonyms, part-whole, category-member, and opposites) and compared priming for pairsin a consistent list with those in an inconsistent list as well as unrelated items. Highly significant N400reductions were found for both relatedness priming (unrelated vs. inconsistent) and relational priming(inconsistent vs. consistent). These data are taken as strong evidence that N400 priming effects are notexclusively carried by ASA-like mechanisms during lexical retrieval but also include post-lexical inte-gration in working memory. We link the present findings to a neurocomputational model for relationalreasoning (Knowlton et al., 2012) and to recent discussions of context-dependent conceptual activations(Yee and Thompson-Schill, 2016).fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0304-3940
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1872-7972
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleNeuroscience letters
oaire.citationVolume651
oaire.citationStartPage192
oaire.citationEndPage197


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Vignette

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.