Show item record

dc.contributor.advisorTappolet, Christine
dc.contributor.authorDishaw, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-14T16:51:11Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2016-11-14T16:51:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-28
dc.date.submitted2016-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/16195
dc.subjectNon-naturalisme moralfr
dc.subjectNaturalisme moralfr
dc.subjectPropriétés moralesfr
dc.subjectMétaphysique des raisonsfr
dc.subjectArgument de la question ouvertefr
dc.subjectG.E. Moorefr
dc.subjectDavid Enochfr
dc.subjectJust-too-different intuitionfr
dc.subjectDerek Parfitfr
dc.subjectIntuition normativefr
dc.subjectJ.L. Mackiefr
dc.subjectMotivation moralefr
dc.subjectThomas Scanlonfr
dc.subjectIs-ought gapfr
dc.subjectMoral naturalismfr
dc.subjectMoral non-naturalismfr
dc.subjectMoral propertiesfr
dc.subjectMetaphysics of reasonsfr
dc.subjectOpen question argumentfr
dc.subjectNormative intuitionfr
dc.subjectMoral motivationfr
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy / Philosophie (UMI : 0422)fr
dc.titleL'éthique et sa place dans la naturefr
dc.typeThèse ou mémoire / Thesis or Dissertation
etd.degree.disciplinePhilosophiefr
etd.degree.grantorUniversité de Montréalfr
etd.degree.levelMaîtrise / Master'sfr
etd.degree.nameM.A.fr
dcterms.abstractUne des questions centrales de la métaéthique est celle de savoir si les propriétés morales sont des propriétés naturelles ou non-naturelles. Ce mémoire fait valoir que nous ferions bien de remettre en question une constellation d’arguments en faveur du non-naturalisme moral : l’argument de la question ouverte, l’intuition normative et l’argument du gouffre. L’influent argument de la question ouverte de Moore, d’abord, ne soutient le non-naturalisme que s’il commet une pétition de principe. L’intuition normative commet ou bien le sophisme d’inférer sur la base de sa différence spécifique qu’une chose n’appartient pas à un genre donné, ou bien sous-estime la panoplie de propriétés naturelles qui possèdent les caractéristiques censées être distinctives des propriétés morales et normatives. L’argument du gouffre, quant à lui, sous-estime l’ubiquité du fossé logique et conceptuel censé marquer une discontinuité métaphysique profonde entre les domaines normatif et naturel.fr
dcterms.abstractOne of the burning questions among metaethical realists is whether moral facts and properties are natural or non-natural. In this thesis, I argue that we should treat a family of arguments for non-naturalism with considerable scepticism: the Open Question Argument, the Normative Intuition, and the argument from the Is-Ought Gap. Moore’s famous Open Question Argument only supports moral non-naturalism if it begs the question against the modest (non-reductionist) naturalist. As for the Normative Intuition, it either commits the fallacy of inferring on the basis of a thing’s specific difference that it does not belong to the genus it putatively belongs to, or it underestimates the breadth of natural properties that possess the features which non-naturalists allege are distinctive of moral and normative properties. The argument from the Is-Ought Gap, for its part, underestimates the ubiquity of the logical and conceptual gap that allegedly marks a deep metaphysical discontinuity between the normative and natural domains.fr
dcterms.languagefrafr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.