dc.contributor.author | Feldblyum, Vivian
| |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-27T19:02:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-27T19:02:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/13357 | |
dc.publisher | Société Philosophique Ithaque | |
dc.rights | Ce texte est publié sous licence Creative Commons : Attribution – Pas d’utilisation commerciale – Partage dans les mêmes conditions 2.5 Canada. | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/legalcode.fr | |
dc.title | Aristotle
on
Thumos
and
Phantasia | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de philosophie | fr |
dcterms.abstract | What is Aristotle’s conception of thumos? This question can be broken down into two separate but related questions: (a) what is the object of desire for thumos, and (b) in which faculty of the soul is thumos grounded? The latter question is the focus of this paper. In this paper, “grounded in” is to be taken physiologically; the second question can be rephrased as “Which faculty of the soul is thumos a function of?” As a general rule Aristotle employs both a colloquial and a technical sense of thumos throughout the corpus. When I ask “What is thumos?,” I am interested in the technical sense that appears primarily in On the Soul and in the Nicomachean Ethics, where thumos is defined as a category of desire (a subset of orexis). The main argument of this paper is that Aristotle’s thumos is grounded in the faculty of phantasia – specifically, a sub-faculty called definite phantasia. | en |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1703-1001 | |
dcterms.language | eng | en |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | |
oaire.citationTitle | Ithaque | |
oaire.citationIssue | 18 | |