Show item record

dc.contributor.authorBrochu, Serge
dc.contributor.authorChayer, Lyne
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T17:40:25Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2015-12-08T17:40:25Z
dc.date.issued1997-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/12693
dc.subjectModèles concéptuelsfr
dc.subjectLibéralisationfr
dc.subjectPénalisationfr
dc.subjectConceptual modelsfr
dc.subjectLiberalizationfr
dc.subjectRepressionfr
dc.subjectModelos conceptuaisfr
dc.subjectLiberalizaçãofr
dc.subjectPenalizaçãofr
dc.titleLes politiques en matière de drogue : une question de valeur?fr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de criminologiefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dcterms.abstractDans le domaine des drogues actuellement illicites, deux courants politiques opposés s'affrontent: un mouvement en faveur de la répression fait face à ce que l'on nomme bien souvent l'anti-prohibitionnisme. Comment, à partir de la réalité actuelle, en arrive-t-on à prendre des positions tellement opposées? L'objectif de cet article consiste à analyser les valeurs dominantes qui sont à la base de chacun de ces discours. La méthode privilégiée pour atteindre cet objectif consiste en une recension des écrits scientifiques des 20 dernières années. Quatre bases de données furent consultées: NCJRS, Socio-file, Psyclitt, et Current Content. De cette interrogation, 200 textes furent retenus pour analyse. L'analyse des écrits scientifiques traitant des politiques répressives envers les drogues et de la position anti-prohibitionniste a permis de faire ressortir trois valeurs principales: la gestion optimale des ressources humaines et sociales, la promotion et la santé, et la liberté individuelle vs la protection de l'état. Ces valeurs ne sont pas mutuellement exclusives puisque certaines idées invoquées en vue de justifier la position défendue peuvent s'appliquer à l'une ou l'autre des valeurs identifiées, démontrant combien ceux-ci sont fortement inter-reliées. Enfin, mentionnons que l'ensemble de ces écrits sur le thème étudié présente des faiblesses majeures - elles sont discutées en conclusion.fr
dcterms.abstractIn the domain of the drugs currently considered as illicit, we face a confrontation between two opposit political positions: a movement for repression opposes the frequently called antiprohibitionism. Based on present reality, how do we take such opposite positions? The aim of this paper is to analyse the dominant values on which each of these speaches are based. The privileged methode to reach this objective consists in a confrontation between scientifical works done in the last 20 years. Four databases were consulted: NCJRS, Socio-file, Psyclitt and Current Content. This search allowed the gathering of 200 texts to be analysed. Scientifical texts on repressive politics against drugs consumption and antiprohibitionist position analysis allowed to emphasyse three main values: optimal management of social and human resources; health promotion; and individual freedom versus statal protection. These values are not reciprocally exclusive since some of the ideas used to justify the defended position may be applied to any of the identified values, showing how these are strongly related. Finally, we refer that this set of texts on the studied theme present enormous weaknesses - these are discussed in conclusion.fr
dcterms.abstractNo âmbito das drogas atualmente ilícitas, assiste-se a um confronto entre duas correntes políticas opostas: um movimento a favor da repressão opõe-se ao que frequentemente apelidamos de anti proibicionismo. Como é que, a partir da realidade atual, chegamos a tomar posições de tal maneira opostas? O objetivo deste artigo consiste em fazer a análise dos valores dominantes que se encontram na base de cada um destes discursos. O método privilegiado para atingir este objetivo consiste num confronto entre os trabalhos científicos elaborados nos últimos 20 anos. Foram consultadas 4 bases de dados: NCJRS, Socio-file, Psyclitt e Current Content. Desta pesquisa foram retirados 200 textos para análise. A análise dos textos científicos sobre políticas repressivas contra a droga e a posição anti proibicionista permitiu realçar três valores principais: a gestão otimizada dos recursos humanos e sociais; a promoção da saúde; e a liberdade individual versus a proteção estatal. Estes valores não são reciprocamente exclusivos uma vez que algumas das ideias invocadas com vista a justificar a posição defendida podem ser aplicadas a qualquer dos valores identificados, demonstrando como estes estão fortemente interligados. Finalmente, referimos que o conjunto destes textos sobre o tema estudado apresenta enormes pontos fracos - estes são discutidos em conclusão.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0874-4890
dcterms.languagefrafr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleToxicodependências
oaire.citationVolume3
oaire.citationIssue1
oaire.citationStartPage15
oaire.citationEndPage24


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.