Abstract(s)
Good faith plays a central role in most legal systems, yet appears to be an
intractable concept. This article proposes to analyse it economically as the
absence of opportunism in circumstances which lend themselves to it. One of the
objectives underlying the law of contract on an economic view is to curtail
opportunism. In spelling out what this means, the paper proposes a three-step
test: bad faith is present where a substantial informational or other asymmetry
exists between the parties, which one of them turns into an undue advantage,
considered against the gains both parties could normally expect to realise
through the contract, and where loss to the disadvantaged party is so serious as
to provoke recourse to expensive self-protection, which significantly raises
transactions costs in the market. The three-step test is then used to analyse a
set of recent decisions in international commercial transactions and three
concepts derived from good faith: fraud, warranty for latent defects and lesion.