Divided Over Internationalism : The Canadian Public and Development Assistance
dc.contributor.author | Noël, Alain | |
dc.contributor.author | Thérien, Jean-Philippe | |
dc.contributor.author | Dallaire, Sébastien | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-02T19:58:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-02T19:58:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-03 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12242 | |
dc.subject | Opinion publique | fr |
dc.subject | Développement | fr |
dc.subject | Internationalisme | fr |
dc.title | Divided Over Internationalism : The Canadian Public and Development Assistance | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de science politique | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2307/3552579 | |
dcterms.abstract | This analysis of public opinion towards foreign aid shows that Canadians are divided over internationalism. First, while most citizens agree that development assistance is important, their support often remains shallow, unmatched by a commitment to undertake concrete actions. Second, the attitudes Canadians hold toward development assistance indicate that there is a clear division in the country’s public between liberal and conservative internationalists, a cleavage that is anchored in domestic ideological and partisan differences. In many ways comparable to what is found in other countries, the internationalism of Canadians does not appear as vigorous and as consensual as is often suggested. | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | |
oaire.citationTitle | Canadian public policy | |
oaire.citationVolume | 30 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 1 | |
oaire.citationStartPage | 29 | |
oaire.citationEndPage | 46 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.